weedipikia (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

@rs31337 Totally agree. It stinks that most politicians, especially Presidents are lawyers or businessmen. The most recent exception I believe was Jimmy Carter. He was a physicist. We need more scientists in office, especially computer scientists. We need people who understand technology and are eager to use it to improve society, instead of treating technology as some abstract thing that's positive yet mysterious.

Kizor (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

@MOUNTAINOUS Bubble sort would be the precise wrong way to go. Just FYI. :-)

MOUNTAINOUS (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

he was a liar then and a liar now. fucking peice of shit

MOUNTAINOUS (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

@MissMidnitetoker half black lol

rs31337 (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

IF we had a programmer as a president, he'd be a pretty damn good one :P

dozza92 (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

Oh, and use the merge sort!

dozza92 (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

And Barack is right again!

irgifted (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

@3wrw89 You know what, radix sort usually is serious overkill and I don't feel like testing anything so yeah you're probably right. I think you just want to stay away from the n^2 ones.

irgifted (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

Do not take the following comment seriously: *ahem* You know, Obama is a hypocrite, he's always saying Republicans are just standing in the way of policies by saying no to ideas without providing any real ones, and here he is saying no to bubble sort. Well what's your idea, Barack? Insertion sort? Selection sort? These aren't new ideas, they're the same old ideas that got us into this mess in the first place!

3wrw89 (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

@irgifted What time complexity did you get for radix sort. The results that I came up with showed that merge sort would be more efficient than radix sort until the problem size is over 4 billion elements.